- 18 86 82 0555
- motqenon.smartbrain.sa@gmail.com
- الرياض , طريق الملك فهد
Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification CSP-Assessor exam dumps is a surefire way to get success. DumpsValid has assisted a lot of professionals in passing their CSP-Assessor test. In case you don't pass the Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification CSP-Assessor exam after using CSP-Assessor pdf questions and practice tests, you have the full right to claim your full refund. You can download and test any CSP-Assessor Exam Questions format before purchase. So don't get worried, start CSP-Assessor exam preparation and get successful.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
>> Swift CSP-Assessor Dumps Questions <<
Our CSP-Assessor test questions can help you have a good preparation for exam effectively. Also you don't need to worry about if our CSP-Assessor study materials are out of validity. We provide one year free updates for every buyer, after purchasing you can download our latest version of CSP-Assessor Training Questions always within one year. And if you have any question on our CSP-Assessor learning guide, you can contact with our service at any time, we will help you pass the CSP-Assessor exam with our high quality of CSP-Assessor exam questions and good service.
NEW QUESTION # 13
Which statements are correct about the Alliance Access LSO and RSO? (Select the two correct answers that apply)
*Connectivity
*Generic
*Products Cloud
*Products OnPrem
*Security
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The Local Security Officer (LSO) and Remote Security Officer (RSO) are roles defined within the SWIFT Alliance suite, particularly for managing security in messaging interfaces like Alliance Access. Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: They are Alliance Security Officers
This is correct. The LSO and RSO are collectively referred to as Alliance Security Officers within the SWIFT ecosystem. The LSO is typically an on-site officer responsible for local security management, while the RSO can perform similar functions remotely, often for distributed environments. These roles are critical for configuring and maintaining security settings in Alliance Access, as outlined in SWIFT's operational documentation. The CSCF Control "6.1 Security Awareness" emphasizes the importance of trained security officers, which aligns with the LSO/RSO roles.
*Option B: Their PKI certificates are stored either on an HSM Token or on an HSM-box This is incorrect. While PKI certificates are used for authentication and are managed within the SWIFT environment, they are not specifically tied to the LSO or RSO roles in terms of storage. PKI certificates for SWIFTNet are stored and managed by the Hardware Security Module (HSM), either as an HSM token (e.g., a smart card) or an HSM-box (e.g., a physical or virtual HSM device). However, these certificates are associated with the SWIFT application or user roles (e.g., for message signing), not the LSO/RSO profiles themselves. The LSO/RSO uses these certificates as part of their duties, but the statement implies ownership or storage, which is inaccurate. CSCF Control "1.3 Cryptographic Failover" specifies HSM management, not LSO/RSO certificate storage.
*Option C: They are the business profiles that can sign the SWIFT financial transactions This is incorrect. The LSO and RSO are security management roles, not business profiles authorized to sign financial transactions. Signing SWIFT financial transactions (e.g., MT103 messages) is the responsibility of authorized business users or automated processes within Alliance Access, who use PKI certificates managed by the HSM. The LSO/RSO's role is to configure and oversee security, not to perform transactional activities.
This distinction is clear in SWIFT's role-based access control documentation.
*Option D: They are responsible for the configuration and management of the security functions in the messaging interface This is correct. The LSO and RSO are tasked with configuring and managing security functions within Alliance Access, such as user access control, authentication settings, and compliance with CSCF requirements. This includes managing PKI certificate usage, setting up secure communication channels, and ensuring the messaging interface adheres to security policies. For example, the LSO can define security profiles and monitor access, as detailed in the Alliance Access Administration Guide, aligning with CSCF Control "2.1 Internal Data Transmission Security." Summary of Correct Answers:
The LSO and RSO are Alliance Security Officers (A) and are responsible for the configuration and management of security functions in the messaging interface (D). Their PKI certificates are not stored by them, and they do not sign transactions.
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024: Control 6.1 highlights the role of security officers like LSO/RSO.
*SWIFT Alliance Access Documentation: Describes LSO/RSO responsibilities for security configuration.
*SWIFT Security Guidelines: Details PKI certificate management by HSM, not LSO/RSO.
========
NEW QUESTION # 14
Is the control 2. 11 "RMA Business Controls" only about the process of validating the defined counterparty relationships?
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 15
In an entity having a small infrastructure and only 2 operators, the HR manager explains in a short interview how the security training is implemented providing one example. Would it be acceptable?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 16
In the illustration, identify which components are in scope of the CSCF? (Choose all that apply.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) defines the scope of components that must comply with its security controls. This scope is detailed in theCSCF v2024(and prior versions like CSCF v2023), which specifies that the CSCF applies to systems directly involved in the Swift messaging and connectivity ecosystem. Let's analyze the diagram to identify which components fall within this scope.
Step 1: Understand the Scope of CSCF
According to theSwift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, the scope includes:
* Swift messaging interfaces(e.g., Alliance Access/Entry, RMA).
* Communication interfacesto the Swift network (e.g., SNL, HSM, PKI).
* Operator systemsdirectly interacting with Swift components (e.g., GUIs, admin/operator workstations).
* Middlewareor connectors directly facilitating Swift message flows.Systems that are not directly involved in Swift messaging or connectivity (e.g., back-office systems, general-purpose servers) are typically out of scope unless they pose a direct risk to the Swift environment.
Step 2: Analyze the Diagram and Identify Components
The diagram includes the following labeled components:
* A. Back Office: A system for back-office operations, not directly part of Swift messaging.
* B. Back Office Using Middleware Client: A back-office system with middleware for data exchange.
* C. Messaging Interface: Likely a Swift messaging interface (e.g., Alliance Access).
* D. RMA: Relationship Management Application, a Swift component for managing messaging relationships.
* E. GUI: Graphical User Interface for operators to interact with the messaging interface.
* F. Communication Interface: Interface for connecting to the Swift network.
* G. SNL: SwiftNet Link, a communication layer for Swift connectivity.
* H. HSM & PKI: Hardware Security Module and Public Key Infrastructure, used for secure Swift connectivity.
* I. Middleware File Transfer Servers: Servers facilitating data exchange between back-office and Swift systems.
* J, K, L. Data Exchange Paths: Represent data flows between systems (not components themselves).
* M. Operator (End User): The operator's workstation interacting with the Swift GUI.
* N. Connector: The connection point to the Swift network.
Step 3: Evaluate Each Option Against CSCF Scope
* A. Components A, B, K
* A (Back Office): Back-office systems are not in scope unless they directly process Swift messages. The CSCF focuses on Swift-specific infrastructure, and back-office systems are typically considered out of scope unless they pose a direct risk (e.g., via middleware).
* B (Back Office Using Middleware Client): While this system uses middleware to exchange data with Swift components, it is still a back-office system, not a core Swift component. The middleware itself (I) may be in scope, but the client (B) is not.
* K (Data Exchange Path): This is a data flow, not a component, and thus not directly in scope.
Conclusion: This option is incorrect.
* B. Components J, K, I
* J, K (Data Exchange Paths): These are data flows, not components, and are not directly in scope.
* I (Middleware File Transfer Servers): Middleware that facilitates Swift message flows (e.g., between back-office and messaging interface) can be in scope if it directlyprocesses or transmits Swift messages. PerControl 1.1: Swift Environment Protection, middleware in the Swift data flow must be secured, making it in scope. However, this option pairs I with J and K, which are not components.Conclusion: This option is incorrect due to J and K, though I alone would be in scope.
* C. Components F, G, H
* F (Communication Interface): This is the interface connecting to the Swift network, clearly in scope perControl 1.1.
* G (SNL): SwiftNet Link is a core communication component for Swift connectivity, in scope per Control 1.1.
* H (HSM & PKI): HSM and PKI are critical for secure Swift connectivity, in scope perControl
1.1.Conclusion: This option is correct.
* D. Components C, E, M
* C (Messaging Interface): This is a core Swift component (e.g., Alliance Access), in scope per Control 1.1.
* E (GUI): The GUI used by operators to interact with the messaging interface is in scope, as specified inControl 1.2: Logical Access Control, which includes operator systems.
* M (Operator End User): The operator's workstation is in scope as it directly interacts with Swift systems, perControl 1.2.Conclusion: This option is correct.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The components in scope of the CSCF are those directly involved in Swift messaging, connectivity, and operator interaction. Based on the analysis:
* C (F, G, H)includes communication components, all in scope.
* D (C, E, M)includes the messaging interface, GUI, and operator workstation, all in scope.Components A, B, and data exchange paths (J, K, L) are not directly in scope, though middleware (I) would be if considered separately.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 1.1: Swift Environment Protection.
* Swift Customer Security Programme - Scope and Applicability, Section: CSCF Scope Definition.
* CSCF v2024, Control 1.2: Logical Access Control.
NEW QUESTION # 17
A Treasury Management System (TMS) application is installed on the same machine as the customer connector (such as MQ server) connecting towards a Service Bureau Are these applications/systems in scope of CSCF?
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question determines the scope of the CSCF for a Treasury Management System (TMS) and an MQ server (customer connector) installed on the same machine.
Step 1: Understand CSCF Scope
TheCSCF v2024defines its scope as systems directly involved in Swift messaging, connectivity, or security (e.
g., customer connectors, messaging interfaces), as perControl 1.1: Swift Environment Protection. Back- office systems, like TMS, are typically out of scope unless they directly process Swift messages.
Step 2: Analyze the Scenario
* TMS Application: A Treasury Management System is a back-office application for financial management, not a Swift messaging component. TheCSCF v2024excludes back-office systems from mandatory scope unless they pose a direct risk to Swift components.
* MQ Server (Customer Connector): This middleware server connects to a Service Bureau, facilitating Swift traffic, making it in scope perControl 1.1.
* Hosting System: The machine hosting both applications is in scope only to the extent it supports the MQ server, not the TMS.
Step 3: Evaluate Each Option
* A. The TMS application, the MQ server and hosting system are in the scope of the CSCF and must be placed in a secure zoneIncorrect. The TMS is out of scope, and the hosting system's inclusion depends on the MQ server, not the TMS.Conclusion: Incorrect.
* B. The TMS application, the MQ server and hosting system enters the scope of the CSCF advisory and should be placed in a secure zoneIncorrect. The CSCF advisory scope applies to best practices, not mandatory controls, and does not mandate a secure zone for out-of-scope TMS.
Conclusion: Incorrect.
* C. Only the MQ server application is in scope of the CSCF. The TMS application is considered as back-officeCorrect. The MQ server is a customer connector, in scope perControl 1.1, while the TMS is a back-office system, excluded from mandatory scope per theCSCF v2024Introduction.Conclusion:
Correct.
* D. The TMS application is the highest risk and must be secured appropriately. The MQ server should be secured on a best effort basisIncorrect. The MQ server, as a Swift component, has higher CSCF priority, while TMS risk is managed outside CSCF scope.Conclusion: Incorrect.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answer isC, as only the MQ server is in scope, and the TMS is a back-office system excluded from CSCF requirements.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 1.1: Swift Environment Protection, Introduction Section: Scope.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Back-Office Systems.
NEW QUESTION # 18
......
For some candidates who will attend the exam, they may have the concern that they can’t pass the exam. CSP-Assessor study guide have the questions and answers for you to train, and we will be pass guaranteed and money back guaranteed, that is to say, if you can’t pass the exam, we will refund your money, or if you have another exam to attend, we will replace other 2 valid exam dumps for free, and if the CSP-Assessor Exam Dumps updates, you can also get the free update for them. Choosing us, and you will benefit a lot.
CSP-Assessor Verified Answers: https://www.dumpsvalid.com/CSP-Assessor-still-valid-exam.html